Class 3
length (sec.) |
Mel. profile |
Dyn. profile |
Note 1 |
Note 2 |
|||
3.1
|
In msg 2 |
1.63 |
|
|
Image (telegraph) |
Cartoon |
|
In msg 6 |
0.72 |
|
|
Image (dring !) |
Realistic sound |
||
Out radio 5 |
0.44 |
|
|
Image : camera |
|||
In mail 5 |
1.22 |
|
|
Klaxon |
|||
Out mail 5 |
1.06 |
|
|
Idem |
|||
-> class 3.1 : only truly realistic samples | |||||||
3.2
|
Alarm 1 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
synth |
||
Alarm 4 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
Kind of flute |
(cartoon) |
||
Alarm 5 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
Watch alarm |
synth |
||
Alarm 2 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
cou-cou |
cartoon |
||
-> class 3.2 : only repetitive samples |
(how do the other repetitive samples look like ?)
Alarm 3 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
Kind of whistle |
cartoon |
|
Alarm 6 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
Boing boing |
cartoon |
(there seem to be no reason that they don't belong to class 3.2 .....)
-> comments on 3.1 <-
(~source perception) the samples make think about familiar & real objects - make think about klaxons & bells
(~ feedback degree +1) hello it's me you have a message
-> comments on 3.2 <-
(~ feedback degree -1) hello ! something's very wrong - danger !
(~ feedback degree 0) time's up - phone ringing to bring attention - programmable clock - schedule alarm
(~ feedback degree +1) it's ready you've got a response - hello !
(~source perception) classical instrument noises
-> conclusions <-
Category 3.1 brings together highly realistic samples -> realistic / non realistic samples is a very important distinction, much more important than any profile infos.
Difficult to conlude anything about category 3.2....