Samples put in the 'Alarm' category
length (sec.) |
Mel. profile |
Dyn. profile |
Note 1 |
Note 2 |
||
(dun seul élem) |
(dun seul élem) |
|||||
In msg 4 |
0.78 |
|
|
Image (telegraph) |
Cartoon |
|
Alarm 1 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
synth |
||
Alarm 5 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
Watch alarm |
synth |
|
Alarm 2 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
cou-cou |
cartoon |
|
Alarm 6 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
Boing boing |
cartoon |
|
Alarm 3 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
Kind of whistle |
cartoon |
|
Alarm 4 |
Repetitive - ad lib |
|
|
Kind of flute |
(cartoon) |
-> conclusion <-
All the alarm samples were naturally put in the alarm category, which cannot leads to any conclusions, apart from the fact that an alarm is obviously considered as repetitive.
This point of view is confirmed by the fact that the'in msg 4' sample, which is put in this alarm category, is also repetitive.