Samples put in the 'Mail in' category
|
length (sec.) |
Mel. profile |
Dyn. profile |
Dyn. profile (global) |
Note 1 |
Note 2 |
||
|
In mail 4 |
1.36 |
|
|
Sleigh bells |
|||
|
In mail 1 |
1.05 |
|
|
 |
Cartoon |
||
|
In mail 6 |
0.89 |
|
|
|
Wood Block |
||
|
Out mail 6 |
0.73 |
|
|
|
Idem |
||
|
In mail 3 |
0.86 |
|
|
cartoon |
|||
|
In msg 6 |
0.72 |
|
|
|
Image (dring !) |
Realistic sound |
The "mail in" category belongs to the "feedback degree +1" category - here is the corresponding typical profile :
| Polyphonic / monophonic | monophonic |
| Dynamic profile | |
| Melodic profile |  |
| Length | 0.5 to 1 s. |
-> conclusions <-
The samples that were put in the "mail in" globally correspond to
the "feedback degree +1" profile when the following criteria are considered
:
* length 0.5 to 1s., monophonic
And they don't correspond to this profile when following the following criterium
:
* melodic profile that is downhill here instead of uphill for the FB+1 profile
The difference concerning the melodic profile can be understood : a mail out is intuitively related to something going out, or upwards - as can be seen for the mail out prototype that sounds like something being thrown in the air, and a mail in is related to something coming to the user, coming downwards.
Concerning our category classification system, it can leads to the following
conclusion :
For the moment, we have only categories, without making any sub-categories.
It would be interesting to make sub categories - in this case, in mail is a
sub category of FB degree +1.
Our sub category "mail in" would have the following profile :
| Polyphonic / monophonic | monophonic |
| Dynamic profile | |
| Melodic profile |  |
| Length | 0.5 to 1 s. |
