Samples put in the 'RadioLink' category
|
length (sec.) |
Mel. profile |
Dyn. profile |
Dyn. profile (global) |
Note 2 |
||
|
Out radio 5 |
0.44 |
|
|
Image : camera |
||
|
In mail 2 |
0.772 |
|
|
|||
|
In radio 4 |
1.55 |
|
|
Granulous |
||
|
In radio 2 |
1.46 |
|
|
 |
synth |
|
|
Out radio 4 |
1.51 |
|
|
Granulous |
||
|
In radio 1 |
1.65 |
|
|
synth |
||
|
Out radio 1 |
1.72 |
|
|
synth |
||
|
Out radio 2 |
1.42 |
|
|
|
||
|
In radio 6 |
1.53 |
|
|
synth |
||
|
Out radio 6 |
2.87 |
|
|
synth |
Theoretically, radio links should belong to the "feedback degree +1" category, of which here is the corresponding profile :
| Polyphonic / monophonic | monophonic |
| Dynamic profile | |
| Melodic profile |  |
| Length | 0.5 to 1 s. |
But, strictly speaking, radio links aren't part of computer sonification - for this reason, they cannot be associated with any previously described category - therefore, radio links should be studied separately.
-> conclusion <-
As this is a new category, we can try to deduce a typical "radio link profile", as we've done with other categories in chapter III.
Dynamic profiles :
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Melodic profiles :
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Total up
|
|
1
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
|
|
 |
Total stable
|
|||
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
|||
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Total down
|
|
2
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
|
|
 |
 |
Total up&down
|
||
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
|
|
 |
 |
Total down&up
|
||
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
|
-/-/-
|
|||||
|
Total monophonic :
|
6
|
||||
|
Total polyphonic :
|
4
|
||||
Durations :
|
0 -> 0,5 s
|
0,5 -> 1 s
|
1 -> 2 s
|
2 -> 3s
|
3 -> 4 s
|
4 - > 6 s
|
6 -> 12s
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
7
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
... obviously, the only profile indication we can take into account is the length : 1->2 sec.
Apart from that, 6 samples out of 10 are typically synth-like. It is probably because the Radio Link functionality sounds new, and therefore the samples must sound hi tech.
--> Radio Link samples can be associated with [ hi tech sounding synth like samples - length 1->2 sec ]
